DEL BLOG DE SIMON JOHNSON DEL FMI

COMENTA el libro de brender/pisani..
Oct 22, 2007
Global Imbalances: What Next?

I took part in a frank discussion over global imbalances very early Sunday morning, organized by Anton Brender and Florence Pisani of Dexia. The topic was their book on this issue and -- most important -- what could follow, particularly after the summer's financial turbulence.

My main argument was that the first phase of global imbalances is likely over. In this phase, the primary imbalance was between the US current account deficit on the one hand and current account surpluses in oil producing countries, Japan, China and few other places. The main issue, which Anton and Florence make clear in their book, was one of flows, i.e., how to get capital from countries that were saving "too much" (or at least more than they wanted to invest) to the US, which was saving "too little" (or less than it was investing.)

We should of course keep in mind that during this first phase, a number of things changed. For example, initially -- in the late 1990s -- US firms invested more than they saved and this accounted for most of the US side of the imbalance. More recently, since around 2000-2001, US firms have saved more than they invested but US households have reduced their savings. So things change in the nature of this imbalance, and it has in the past been dangerous to make predictions about behavior.

Still, it now appears likely that US households will save more -- after all, few now expect property prices to continue to rise and other asset prices might also be regarded as high. This doesn't have to be a big, rapid or disruptive change, but it will likely raise savings in the US and help take the current account down to 5 1/2 percent (or smaller?) in 2008.

But if the US current account deficit is smaller, what does that imply for other countries' current accounts? Remember, that savings and investment have to add up around the world. So if the US has a smaller deficit and we want to sustain broadly the same level of world growth, either someone else has to come up with a deficit (which is large enough to make a difference) or the surplus countries have to reduce their surpluses.

But oil prices are now unexpectedly high and oil producers, who are trying hard to spend, will almost certainly have large surpluses in the near term than previously thought. Japan has zero or close to zero inflation and growth is not so very strong, so its interest rates remain appropriately low. This will likely prove consistent with a continued surplus -- although this has been driven by high savings in the corporate sector; they have reduced debt levels over the past 10 years so they are now very similar to other OECD countries, but it is not clear that they will now go out and spend more.

Now, contrary to some impressions, China is actually experiencing an appreciation in its real exchange rate -- mostly due to high inflation. In its Multilateral Consultation plan, China expressed the intention of rebalancing the economy more broadly (away from investment and exports and towards consumption), but including exchange rate flexibility. Even so, based on what we have seen in the past few months, a robust Chinese current account surplus is the foreseeable future. This is based on very strong performances, profits and savings in the corporate sector -- really the results of successful development. But still, in the near term, this part of the global imbalances is not getting smaller.

So again, if the US current account deficit goes down, and the surpluses do not go down, whose deficit will go up? This is the very big question of the day. How this question is answered is likely to have a first order impact on global growth.

Posted at 06:05 PM in Global Imbalances | Permalink
TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2663166/22643022

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Global Imbalances: What Next?:
Comments

Simon, the book on imbalances is a great find.

IMHO, you've left the US government's saving out of the equation though as Sg+Sp=I+CA. I am less sanguine in assuming that the US CAD will narrow significantly over the next few years given that the baby boomer generation will start retiring soon and has saved very little. As GAO Comptroller General David Walker has noted, an impending tsunami of entitlement spending will likely assure that America's deficits are here to stay.

Posted by: Emmanuel | Oct 22, 2007 at 10:57 PM

Dear Simon,
I am not quite sure of how high inflation can lead to appreciation in real exchange rate. I would appreciate if you can enlighten me on this matter. Thanks.
"Now, contrary to some impressions, China is actually experiencing an appreciation in its real exchange rate -- mostly due to high inflation... "

Posted by: Hai Rick | Oct 23, 2007 at 04:27 AM

Simon, will the appreciation of Canadian dollar and Euro reduce their current account surpluses? As in China, the pressure of currency revaluation is mounting in the oil-exporting Gulf economies. May be we would see some rebalancing from their part.

Posted by: Syed Basher | Oct 23, 2007 at 11:58 AM

Hai, a real apreciation is a rise in the cost of local chinese goods vis a vis those of external goods. That can happen either with a rise in the price of local goods expressed in local currency (local inflation being higher than external) or with a rise in the local currency vs foreign currency (a nominal appreciation). China is now doing both, at least vs. US.

Dear Simon, as an argentine citizen, can you list us in the "CA surplus down, future deficit risinng" column? We can help solving Global Imbalances.

Posted by: raft | Oct 23, 2007 at 03:02 PM

Excellent post. I tend to agree with Simon and have written a little piece commenting on this article and welcoming Simon to the blogging world (kind of) ;-)

http://china-economics-blog.blogspot.com/2007/10/imf-on-global-imbalances-what-next.html

Posted by: China Economist | Oct 24, 2007 at 06:17 AM

DEL BLOG DE SIMON JOHNSON

Oct 22, 2007
Global Imbalances: What Next?

I took part in a frank discussion over global imbalances very early Sunday morning, organized by Anton Brender and Florence Pisani of Dexia. The topic was their book on this issue and -- most important -- what could follow, particularly after the summer's financial turbulence.

My main argument was that the first phase of global imbalances is likely over. In this phase, the primary imbalance was between the US current account deficit on the one hand and current account surpluses in oil producing countries, Japan, China and few other places. The main issue, which Anton and Florence make clear in their book, was one of flows, i.e., how to get capital from countries that were saving "too much" (or at least more than they wanted to invest) to the US, which was saving "too little" (or less than it was investing.)

We should of course keep in mind that during this first phase, a number of things changed. For example, initially -- in the late 1990s -- US firms invested more than they saved and this accounted for most of the US side of the imbalance. More recently, since around 2000-2001, US firms have saved more than they invested but US households have reduced their savings. So things change in the nature of this imbalance, and it has in the past been dangerous to make predictions about behavior.

Still, it now appears likely that US households will save more -- after all, few now expect property prices to continue to rise and other asset prices might also be regarded as high. This doesn't have to be a big, rapid or disruptive change, but it will likely raise savings in the US and help take the current account down to 5 1/2 percent (or smaller?) in 2008.

But if the US current account deficit is smaller, what does that imply for other countries' current accounts? Remember, that savings and investment have to add up around the world. So if the US has a smaller deficit and we want to sustain broadly the same level of world growth, either someone else has to come up with a deficit (which is large enough to make a difference) or the surplus countries have to reduce their surpluses.

But oil prices are now unexpectedly high and oil producers, who are trying hard to spend, will almost certainly have large surpluses in the near term than previously thought. Japan has zero or close to zero inflation and growth is not so very strong, so its interest rates remain appropriately low. This will likely prove consistent with a continued surplus -- although this has been driven by high savings in the corporate sector; they have reduced debt levels over the past 10 years so they are now very similar to other OECD countries, but it is not clear that they will now go out and spend more.

Now, contrary to some impressions, China is actually experiencing an appreciation in its real exchange rate -- mostly due to high inflation. In its Multilateral Consultation plan, China expressed the intention of rebalancing the economy more broadly (away from investment and exports and towards consumption), but including exchange rate flexibility. Even so, based on what we have seen in the past few months, a robust Chinese current account surplus is the foreseeable future. This is based on very strong performances, profits and savings in the corporate sector -- really the results of successful development. But still, in the near term, this part of the global imbalances is not getting smaller.

So again, if the US current account deficit goes down, and the surpluses do not go down, whose deficit will go up? This is the very big question of the day. How this question is answered is likely to have a first order impact on global growth.

Posted at 06:05 PM in Global Imbalances | Permalink
TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2663166/22643022

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Global Imbalances: What Next?:
Comments

Simon, the book on imbalances is a great find.

IMHO, you've left the US government's saving out of the equation though as Sg+Sp=I+CA. I am less sanguine in assuming that the US CAD will narrow significantly over the next few years given that the baby boomer generation will start retiring soon and has saved very little. As GAO Comptroller General David Walker has noted, an impending tsunami of entitlement spending will likely assure that America's deficits are here to stay.

Posted by: Emmanuel | Oct 22, 2007 at 10:57 PM

Dear Simon,
I am not quite sure of how high inflation can lead to appreciation in real exchange rate. I would appreciate if you can enlighten me on this matter. Thanks.
"Now, contrary to some impressions, China is actually experiencing an appreciation in its real exchange rate -- mostly due to high inflation... "

Posted by: Hai Rick | Oct 23, 2007 at 04:27 AM

Simon, will the appreciation of Canadian dollar and Euro reduce their current account surpluses? As in China, the pressure of currency revaluation is mounting in the oil-exporting Gulf economies. May be we would see some rebalancing from their part.

Posted by: Syed Basher | Oct 23, 2007 at 11:58 AM

Hai, a real apreciation is a rise in the cost of local chinese goods vis a vis those of external goods. That can happen either with a rise in the price of local goods expressed in local currency (local inflation being higher than external) or with a rise in the local currency vs foreign currency (a nominal appreciation). China is now doing both, at least vs. US.

Dear Simon, as an argentine citizen, can you list us in the "CA surplus down, future deficit risinng" column? We can help solving Global Imbalances.

Posted by: raft | Oct 23, 2007 at 03:02 PM

Excellent post. I tend to agree with Simon and have written a little piece commenting on this article and welcoming Simon to the blogging world (kind of) ;-)

http://china-economics-blog.blogspot.com/2007/10/imf-on-global-imbalances-what-next.html

Posted by: China Economist | Oct 24, 2007 at 06:17 AM

world economic outlouk april 2007

world economic outlouk april 2007

PERU: APRECIACION CAMBIARIA CASI 7%

CHINA 2008: BAJARIA A 10.4%

SUBE EL PETROLEO A 95

PETROLEO sube 58% en el año..(ver)

INFLACION PERUANA

inflacion 3.94% duplica meta..(sigue)